2026 and the unravelling of the eurocentric world order

History rarely signals its turning points with precision, yet certain moments reveal structural change with unmistakable force. We are living through one such moment. Amid the noise of wars, sanctions, and diplomatic brinkmanship, a deeper transformation is underway. By 2026, the Eurocentric world order—long dominant not only in power but in moral authority—may finally reach its historical limit.

What is unfolding is not global disorder, but a long-delayed correction. Asia and the Global South are reasserting their centrality after centuries of marginalization. This transition echoes the great wave of decolonization following the Second World War, when leaders from Nehru to Sukarno, from Nasser to Nkrumah, challenged the idea that Europe alone embodied political maturity or civilizational legitimacy. The Bandung Conference of 1955 symbolized that revolt. Today’s shift, however, is even more consequential: it is structural, economic, and epistemic.

At its core, this moment marks the erosion of a powerful European assumption—that non-Western societies are inherently unequal, perpetually “developing,” and intellectually dependent on Western interpretations of truth. From the Enlightenment onward, Europe universalized its own historical experience, treating its political values as neutral, rational, and self-evident, while dismissing alternative civilizational paths as deviations. That epistemic hierarchy is now being rejected. The world no longer accepts that truth must be filtered through a European moral lens.

In this changing landscape, Donald Trump occupies an unexpectedly pivotal role. If he follows the strategic logic outlined in the National Security Strategy released on December 5, the United States appears prepared to abandon the illusion of universal dominance. Instead, Washington seems intent on reconciling differences with Russia and consolidating power within its own hemisphere. This represents a departure from post–Cold War interventionism and reflects an implicit acknowledgment of American limits.

India’s marginal presence in the NSS should not be mistaken for insignificance. Rather, it underscores India’s success in preserving strategic autonomy—a principle championed during the Cold War by non-aligned leaders who refused to subordinate national interest to great-power rivalry. By resisting pressure to sever ties with Russia and by easing confrontation with China, India has retained diplomatic flexibility. Cooperation with the United States will continue, but on terms that reflect equality rather than alignment.

The consequences of America’s strategic retrenchment are most visible in Europe. Trump’s reported decision to send Jeff Landry, the Governor of Louisiana, to Denmark to persuade Greenlanders to consider joining the United States has thrown the Kingdom of Denmark into strategic uncertainty. More broadly, it highlights Europe’s diminishing capacity to shape outcomes—even in matters affecting its own territories.

Europe today faces a convergence of crises. The European Union, once hailed as the pinnacle of post-national governance, is increasingly strained by uncontrolled migration, rising public resentment, and the growing influence of far-right and Eurosceptic movements. These forces are not anomalies; they are symptoms of a deeper loss of confidence in the European project itself.

The continent’s leading economies—Germany, France, and the United Kingdom—are grappling with deindustrialization, high energy costs, and the erosion of manufacturing employment. Economic recovery remains elusive. Europe increasingly risks becoming a region defined by demographic decline and outward migration, as younger generations seek opportunity beyond its borders. In a historical irony, a continent that once extracted wealth from the world now struggles to generate growth at home.

Should the United States succeed in normalizing relations with Russia, a new phase of relative stability may emerge. Such a shift would also ease China’s strategic concerns, as Washington has shown little appetite for direct confrontation. Yet Europe, having positioned itself against both Moscow and—at times—Washington, may find itself isolated by this recalibration.

Europe has overreached. By assuming moral superiority and strategic indispensability, it misjudged both its material strength and its geopolitical leverage. The year 2026 may expose the costs of these assumptions. Smaller regions—from Venezuela to Greenland—are already being drawn into America’s hemispheric consolidation, while Europe struggles to assert agency.

Denmark’s case is instructive. In 2025 alone, it reportedly spent more on Ukraine than France, Italy, and Spain combined. Such commitments are increasingly difficult to justify as economic pressures mount at home. Across Europe, the prospect of building a large-scale, independent defense industry remains doubtful. Welfare states are under strain, public debt is rising, and popular opposition to militarization is growing.

India’s trajectory offers a contrasting lesson. By prioritizing stability over spectacle and engagement over confrontation, India has positioned itself as a bridge in an emerging multipolar order. Enhanced cooperation with China, however cautious, reflects an understanding that Asia’s rise cannot be managed through perpetual rivalry. 2026 may thus mark a strategic consolidation for India, rather than a rupture.

As the United States and Asia accelerate ahead in artificial intelligence, industrial production, and technological innovation, Europe risks prolonged economic stagnation. The deeper irony is not material decline, but intellectual dislocation. A continent that once claimed universality must now learn to coexist in a plural world.

The Eurocentric order is ending—not merely as a system of power, but as a worldview. What replaces it is a multipolar reality in which no single civilization monopolizes truth, and where equality among nations is no longer aspirational, but unavoidable. History, long postponed, is finally catching up.

END OF ARTICLE